Background Image
Previous Page  398 / 530 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 398 / 530 Next Page
Page Background

397

What we can state for now is that the number of archeologically documented

settlements remains reduced. Only settlements found near the forts and

vici militares

are documented, as those found at Tibiscum, Praetorium, perhaps Berzobis.

In other cases, when reffering to the Almăj area, the scarce presence of rural

distanced settlements was determined by harsh living conditions, and only raising

cattle was at the utmost importance.

Southwest Dacia, especially the hilly area comprises less favorable large-

scale agriculture. It could ensure local needs of the communities, but had no

meaning in the export market. Instead, we believe that farming could meet the

needs of provincial payments to the Roman State and could provide an important

basis for exchange. The two sections of

conductores

,

found at Tibiscum and Micia

are relevant in this respect, making a point in controlling the occupation and of the

pastures above all. Dalboşeţ and perhaps, Lăpuşnicel could have served as head-

quarters for imperial domeins, or even as seats of great senators, for whom we do

not posess epigraphical clues so far, as I. Piso supposes.

The property forms the basis of small and medium agricultural economy in

the province, which originally was accomplished by veteran colonization. It would

explain in a large extent the large number of knights found in the major cities of the

province as Ulpia Traiana (17), Apulum (17), although the only senator mentioned

in Apulum was Gemellus P. Aelius.

In the Banat Mountains the metal exploitations areas are grouped as follows:

Reşita (Semenic Mountains), Bocşa–Ocna de Fier–Dognecea–Oraviţa–Sasca–

Moldova Nouă (Locvei Mountains), Ruşchiţa (Poiana Ruscă Mountains), Bozovici.

These areas were rich in iron, nonferrous metals such as copper, lead, silver and

lesser amounts of gold etc.

Banat mineral resources have since early times attracted the attention of

Romans. As expected immediately after the formation of Dacia, mining came under

Roman administration for organization and administration. We do not have any

clue on how minerals were exploited in pre Roman period.

Southwest Dacia

formed a

complex mining district

. It contained two large

areas rich in mineral resources. The first one is grouped around today settlements

of Bocşa, Ocna de Fier, Berzovia, Eftimie Murgu, maybe Dognecea, for which

there is still no conclusive epigraphic evidence found. A special place here has

Centum Putea

toponym identified in the literature to Surducu Mare. Since the

ancient city appears on the defensive line route from Lederata–Tibiscum, represented

on

Tabula Peutingeriana

, this has led to the location of the military center with

mining toponimy at Surducu Mare.

V. Wollmann raised the hipothesis that this toponym should refer to Moldova

Nouă, where evident clues of intense mining activity appear. The toponym apears

only very late on Tabula Peutingeriana, an error could occur if we consider the two

centers. The hipothesis is even more interesting and we do believe in its accuracy.

At the same time, it is possible that one of the two centers, either the one from

Bocşa or Ocna de Fier found closer to the area in discussion to have beared this

toponym during ancient times. The second area is concentrated in southern Banat,