Background Image
Previous Page  395 / 530 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 395 / 530 Next Page
Page Background

394

along with the ones from south Danube provinces. In south western Dacia,

Tibiscum and Dierna municipalities were constituted with their own territories

detached from that of Ulpia Trajana Sarmizegetusa. Also along the urban territories

in south western Dacia there was a mining district that probably gathered settlements

found in the mountain area of Banat with a distinct organisation, dependent on

central administrative authority of Dacia Apulensis. Its head office was in Moldova

Nouă judging by the discoveries made so far.

In Banat plain area we may notice at the debut of Commodus reign a transfer

from

barbaricum

of Dacian population ellements from the middle area of the

Danube, thus from a territory situated North of the river, where they inhabitated the

space alongside other populations. The decision taken by the management of the

province to bring some tribes having the same origin as the autochtonous populations

at the Dacian border is an indication of the protection intent. These populations

were regarded as a peaceful sedentary group designed to populate a territory partly

arid as it was the Banat Plain, maybe even that of Crişana, for a rigorous control by

the Tisza, but also likely to provide an important area for transhumance of the

cattle from Dacia or in the province. It outlines three inhabitated areas in the plain

of Banat:

1. Along the Danube in front of Moesia Superior, where civil constructions

made of stone and brick, some bearing the stamps of IIII Flavia and VII Claudia

legions, such as for example those from Pančevo, Kovin, Gaj, Banatska Palanka

Bela Crkva, Vrsač facing the second wave.

2. An area which extends from the sands of Deliblata to Mureş with rural

settlements dated in general in the 3

rd

–4

th

centuries. Their inventory consists of fine

grey hand made Dacian pottery having Latène tradition and imported Roman items.

On Romanian territory the settlements from Timişoara–Cioreni, Timişoara–Freidorf (I)

Dumbrăviţa must be mentioned, adding Liebling and in Serbia: Subotica, Becej,

Kovacica, etc.

3. The area around the old course of Mureş River, with the settlement in a

place called

Sălişte

from Sânnicolaul Mare.

These settlements found in this area we integrate into the Getae-Dacian

structures because of common elements found in their organisation and inventory,

rural settlements housing household linked arrangements (household pits, supply

pits) and crafts (pottery workshops discovered at Dolovo, Vrsač, Freidorf–Timişoara

(level I), Hodoni, Arad–Ceala etc.) Ceramic joint inventory of these settlements

largely suggests the sedentary rural character of this population. Too few clues on

some crafts such as metalworking appeared in the area in the form of blowing tubes

from iron reducing furnaces, probably (at Dragşina, Biled), or small melting pots

for bronze (Cioreni, Freidorf). Roman imports are of modest value, they relate

mainly to bronze ornaments (bracelets, fibulae), glass (beads) and in rare cases

Roman coins.

Over time in Banat plain some treasures have emerged such as those from

Biled (2000 pieces), Timişoara (two locations), Palanka, Recaş having a long

period of accumulation.